Home   | News   | Events   | Careers   | Library   | Topics   | Members   | Vendor Directory   
Register Now!
Experts Archive
With the advent of huge spam levels, plus restrictions on email marketing from the EU, what is the effectiveness of permission email to customers and to prospects?
Andy Wood, MD, GI Insight
How can I better define which inbound leads are more likely to convert so I can prioritize them more effectively?
Paul McConville, Director of Consumer-Facing Services , TARGUSinfo
What’s Next for Speech?
John P. Joseph, VP Corporate Marketing, Envox Worldwide
How can I show measurable value from my monitoring and recording system?
Gerry Johnsen, Product Manager, Calabrio, Inc.
There has been a certain amount of scepticism surrounding CRM in the past, but now it seems like everyone is doing it. Is this the case?
Andy Wood, MD, GI Insight
Experts Panel
Meet some of the leading gurus in the marketplace that have joined the Experts Panel of CRM2day.
Learn more about their fields of expertise.
Ask the Experts
Are you a member of CRM2day and want to share your questions with our Experts Panel, regarding any current hot CRM issues?
Take this challenge and ask them for free!
Customer Relationship Management (CRM) Today - Experts Corner Customer Relationship Management (CRM) Today - Highlights

Colin Shearer, VP Product Marketing, SPSS

You Asked
How can data mining be used as a tool to prevent fraud protection?
 
The Expert's Answer

In many applications of data mining – for example, deciding who to target with marketing offers – it’s straightforward to decide how to approach the problem. There are reasonably large numbers of past cases we can look at and say, “Yes, she bought this when offered,” or “No, he didn’t buy”, and build models that tell buyers from non-buyers. In fraud, the situation is different.

Often, at the start of analysis, fraud is simply suspected, rather than known for sure – there are no confirmed historical cases to learn from. And the occurrence may be very low – the needles are few and the haystacks are large.

The first approach is usually “anomaly detection” – using data mining algorithms which identify cases that are different from most of the others, often in ways which are far too subtle to be detected manually. These “anomalies” are just that – cases which are unusual, but are not necessarily bad. Human follow up is essential – expert investigators study the anomalies, and decide which are truly fraudulent.

Once these genuine fraud cases have been identified, the “learning” capability of data mining comes into play – building models that ensure any similar type of fraud in future is detected automatically. Fraudsters constantly change their approaches to try to stay undetected, so anomaly detection to find new, emerging patterns is always important, with predictive models being built to recognize known fraud types.

Fraud detection models can give great value when deployed to the “front-line” – intercepting attempted fraud as it happens. For example, some insurance companies are using models which assess the “risk score” of a claim as it is entered, e.g,. in call centers. This not only means that more fraudulent claims can be detected (and at an earlier stage), but also that low-risk claims can be “fast-tracked." This leads to better customer satisfaction, and reduces claim handling costs by streamlining the process for “safe” claims.

SPSS

Welcome Guest!
Register for Free! Login:
Username:
Password:
Forgot your password?
Corporate Members
Click here to visit the online media kit of CRM Today